See which six standalone English words change, which text passes through, and why the mixed result is not a constructed-language translation.
The site-specific token result will be shown here...
Each sample is calculated by the same ordered replacements, including case folding, whole-word boundaries, unchanged English, and preserved marks.
English
Hello, my friend!
Translation
hei, ma frien!
Three standalone targets replaced without removing comma or exclamation mark
English
You go with people.
Translation
yu gou with kru.
You go and people changed while with remains untouched
English
MY PEOPLE, GO!
Translation
ma kru, gou!
Uppercase targets converted to their fixed lowercase replacement forms
English
A friendly hello
Translation
A friendly hei
Friendly is outside the map because friend is not a separate word
English
Younger people42 go-now
Translation
Younger people42 gou-now
Larger alphanumeric tokens skipped while a hyphenated go token matches
English
My friend and you go
Translation
ma frien and yu gou
Four map entries changed around an unlisted conjunction
| Sequence | Standalone Input | Site Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | hello | hei |
| 2 | people | kru |
| 3 | friend | frien |
| 4 | my | ma |
| 5 | you | yu |
| 6 | go | gou |
This table is the full site-specific lookup used for forward processing, not a sample drawn from a larger hidden resource.
Short contrasts make the matcher easier to audit and reveal which source information the fixed outputs discard.
| Source Token | Result Type | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| GO | gou | Case ignored on match |
| go! | gou! | Punctuation retained |
| going | going | Target is embedded |
| people42 | people42 | Digit prevents final boundary |
Create cases for uppercase targets, adjacent punctuation, larger words, digit-attached strings, and repeated matches. Comparing the expected and observed strings makes regression changes easy to spot in this deterministic formatter.

A fan writer may place one mapped token in a planning note while retaining the English sentence. Tag the result as site-generated shorthand so collaborators do not treat it as reviewed dialogue or a language lesson.

Compare MY, My, and my to show why all three become ma. This is a concise example of information loss and explains why the forward output cannot supply the source capitalization later.

Highlight mapped outputs in one color and untouched English in another. The visual inventory exposes how little of an ordinary sentence this six-entry list processes and discourages overreading the result.

Its content is limited to verifiable string behavior, attribution boundaries, and reproducible test cases.
Every source token and replacement string used by the local converter appears in the reference table, with no suggestion of an unseen lexicon.
Standalone matches work beside punctuation, while letters or digits attached to a target usually keep it outside the replacement condition.
The formatter does not analyze grammar, pronunciation, inflection, register, meaning, or whether a phrase is accepted by speakers or reference authors.
The page uses its topic label for discovery while distinguishing a small site map from endorsed material, licensed dialogue, or a reference work.
The answers describe only the current GuruTrans implementation and its limits.
Check out these related translation and AI tools to enhance your experience
Treat the output as a six-rule site artifact and make the remaining English visible whenever you quote or discuss the result.
Use a mapped word alone, beside punctuation, and inside a longer token. That comparison shows whether a result came from the disclosed whole-word matcher rather than a broader dictionary.
After processing, identify every source word that passed through. Those unchanged spans are not validated Trigedasleng; they are simply outside this site's six replacement entries.
If the draft is shared for a fan exercise, include the six rows and original sentence. This keeps the output traceable without implying language expertise or franchise approval.
Run a boundary-aware sample, review it against all six entries, and attach the source plus scope label to any fan-style note you keep.